• About
  • Team
  • Contact
  • Core Values
  • Editorial Standards
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Affiliate Disclosure
Resist the Mainstream
No Result
View All Result
STORE
  • Politics
  • US
  • COVID
  • Media Watch
  • World
  • Story of Hope
  • Opinion
NEWSLETTER
Get Ad-Free Login Manage Account
  • Politics
  • US
  • COVID
  • Media Watch
  • World
  • Story of Hope
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
Resist the Mainstream
No Result
View All Result

Juror From Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Could Set the Stage for a Mistrial

RTM Staff by RTM Staff
March 8, 2022
1

RELATED

Elon Musk Claims He’s ‘Buying Manchester United’

Prominent Economist Nouriel Roubini Makes Two Bleak Predictions for the Economy

One of the jurors involved in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell could have set the stage for a possible mistrial over reportedly glossing over one of the questions in the jury selection form packet in Maxwell’s trial that ran from late November through December.

ADVERTISEMENTS
ON
OFF

Juror No. 50 appeared in federal court on March 8 where he plead the Fifth Amendment—the Constitutional right to refuse to answer questions in order to avoid incriminating himself.

Advertisements

The Honorable Alison J. Nathan, the judge who presided over the case in December, granted him immunity from prosecution with the exception of perjury.

“You need to answer my questions today and you need to answer truthfully,” she instructed the juror, who chose not to disclose his actual name.

Soon after the jury’s Dec. 29 guilty verdict on five of six counts of sex trafficking of a minor, Juror No. 50 stated publicly he was a victim of childhood sexual abuse and had made this known to his fellow jurors during deliberations.

At the center of the issue is the questionnaire potential jurors filled out prior to selection.

Juror No. 50 did not accurately answer questions relating to his childhood, sexual abuse at the hands of a stepbrother and his friend, prompting Maxwell’s defense to push for a new trial.

Nathan read the pertinent questions with his responses, which were written on Nov.4, 2021, the first day he reported for jury duty.

Juror No. 50 selected “no” to the first question that referred to sexual abuse, asking if he, a friend, or a family member had ever been a victim of it.

“Is ′no′ an accurate answer to that question?” Nathan asked him.

“No, it is not,” he replied and said the accurate answer is “yes.”

Juror No. 50 repeatedly cited the reasons for his incorrect answers.

One was he was sidetracked while filling out the questionnaire.

Advertisements

“At this point, I was super distracted,” he said and described sitting at the table at the spot where others were piling their completed paperwork and asking questions.

“I felt rushed only because of all the commotion going on in front of me,” he said.

A second was with the “sheer volume” of potential jurors, he didn’t anticipate being chosen.

“I never thought I’d be one of the 12,” he said.

The third reason was he didn’t consider himself a victim, so he breezed by the questions pertaining to victimhood.

Some of the questions referring to sexual abuse had boxes to check, that included “self” and “family and friends.”

Juror No. 50 stated multiple times, that in his haste, he never noticed the “self” boxes.

He showed remorse for his lack of focus calling it “one of the biggest mistakes I ever made in my life.” He said he did not intentionally give an incorrect answer.

“I skimmed. I didn’t read everything,” he said and described the questionnaire as “a pretty thick packet.”

Juror No. 50 also said several times that had he answered the questions accurately, he would still have been a fair and impartial juror and would have still have had the ability to render a fair and just verdict based on the evidence submitted at trial.

This is an excerpt from The Epoch Times.

Scroll down to leave a comment and share your thoughts.

TRENDING TODAY

Epstein-Linked Judge To Rule Thursday About Unsealing Search Affidavit
Politics

Epstein-Linked Judge To Rule Thursday About Unsealing Search Affidavit

by John Symank
August 16, 2022
Starbucks Makes Surprising Admission About Mail-in Ballots
Politics

Starbucks Makes Surprising Admission About Mail-in Ballots

by Tony Gray
August 16, 2022

© 2022 Resist the Mainstream
Get Ad-Free Login Manage Account
No Result
View All Result
  • Newsletter
  • Store
  • Politics
  • US
  • COVID
  • Media Watch
  • World
  • Story of Hope
  • Opinion
  • About
  • Team
  • Contact
  • Core Values
  • Editorial Standards
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Affiliate Disclosure

© 2022 Resist the Mainstream

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?