• About
  • Team
  • Contact
  • Core Values
  • Editorial Standards
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Affiliate Disclosure
Resist the Mainstream
No Result
View All Result
STORE
  • Politics
  • US
  • COVID
  • Media Watch
  • World
  • Story of Hope
  • Opinion
NEWSLETTER
Get Ad-Free Login Manage Account
  • Politics
  • US
  • COVID
  • Media Watch
  • World
  • Story of Hope
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
Resist the Mainstream
No Result
View All Result

Judge Strikes Down California’s Corporate Racial Diversity Law

RTM Staff by RTM Staff
April 2, 2022
0

RELATED

Leonardo DiCaprio Funneled Grants Through Dark Money Group to Fund Climate Nuisance Lawsuits, Emails Show

Rashida Tlaib Pocketed as Much as $100K In Rental Income During The Pandemic Despite Pushing to Cancel Rent

A California law that would have required corporations based in the state to include racial minorities and LGBT people on their executive boards was struck down by a judge in Los Angeles Friday.

ADVERTISEMENTS
ON
OFF

The law was declared unconstitutional by a judge in the Los Angeles County Superior Court in a lawsuit brought by conservative legal organization Judicial Watch, the Associated Press reported. The ruling did not explain the Court’s reasoning.

Advertisements

The law was signed by California Governor Gavin Newsom in 2020. It would have required publicly traded companies headquartered in California to have at least one member on their executive boards of directors from an “underrepresented community,” which included African Americans, Latinos, Asians, Native Americans, or members of the LGBT community, by the end of 2021, either by adding an executive position or filling an existing vacancy.

By the end of 2022, the law would have required companies with boards of 4-9 directors to have at least two directors from minority communities, and boards with 9 or more members to have at least three minority directors. Firms that did not comply would have faced fines of up to $100,000 dollars for first offenses and $300,000 for repeated offenses, AP reported.

The suit was filed by Judicial Watch in October 2020. The organization said that using taxpayer dollars to enforce “[l]aws that explicitly distinguish between individuals on racial or ethnic, sexual preference, and transgender status grounds fall within the core of the prohibition of the equal protection clause.” California defended the law by arguing that the measure did not “discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.”

Advertisements

Citing a report from the California Secretary of State, AP also reported that about 300 of the 700 corporations that fell under the law had complied, while half of the companies had not even filed a mandated disclosure statement on the racial makeup of their boards. But to date, no companies had been fined, and the state argued in Court that no taxpayer dollars actually had been used to enforce the measure.

“This historic California court decision declared unconstitutional one of the most blatant and significant attacks in the modern era on constitutional prohibitions against discrimination,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a press release after the ruling. “In its ruling today, the court upheld the core American value of equal protection under the law. Judicial Watch’s taxpayer clients are heroes for standing up for civil rights against the Left’s pernicious efforts to undo anti-discrimination protections.”

This is an excerpt from The Daily Wire.

Scroll down to leave a comment and share your thoughts.

TRENDING TODAY

Trump’s Private Message to Merrick Garland Before DOJ Press Conference Is Revealed: Report
US

Trump’s Private Message to Merrick Garland Before DOJ Press Conference Is Revealed: Report

by RTM Staff
August 14, 2022
Cruise Line Makes Major Change in COVID-19 Policy for Unvaccinated Passengers
COVID

Cruise Line Makes Major Change in COVID-19 Policy for Unvaccinated Passengers

by RTM Staff
August 14, 2022

© 2022 Resist the Mainstream
Get Ad-Free Login Manage Account
No Result
View All Result
  • Newsletter
  • Store
  • Politics
  • US
  • COVID
  • Media Watch
  • World
  • Story of Hope
  • Opinion
  • About
  • Team
  • Contact
  • Core Values
  • Editorial Standards
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Affiliate Disclosure

© 2022 Resist the Mainstream

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?